I've tried nearly every Linux package manager - these remain my favorite

ZDNET's key takeaways Linux has numerous package managers.There are command-line and GUI tools for the task.Not all package ...

Snap vs. Flatpak: How to decide which Linux package manager is right for you

Snap and Flatpak are Linux universal package managers. Both have their pros and cons. Each gives Linux far more apps to choose from. Flatpak and Snap are universal package managers. Both are simple to ...
How-To Geek on MSN

Linux phones are getting even better with postmarketOS 25.12

The latest postmarketOS 25.12 release now uses Alpine Linux 3.23 as its foundation, and switches to version 3 of the Alpine ...
Linux Journal

The Evolution of Linux Package Management and Its Impact on Modern Computing

If you’ve ever used a modern Linux distribution, you’ve likely experienced the convenience of installing and updating software with a single command. Package managers, the tools behind this ease of ...
Network World

Installing packages on Linux and Mac with Homebrew

Ever heard of Homebrew? It’s a package manager with a very unusual feature. It allows ordinary users to install packages without using sudo, and it’s available for both macOS and Linux. While the tool ...
Linux Journal

YUM vs. APT: Understanding Package Managers on Linux and Finding the CUDA Version

When it comes to package management on Linux systems, two popular tools are YUM and APT. YUM, short for Yellowdog Updater Modified, is commonly used in Red Hat-based distributions like CentOS and RHEL ...
ZDNet

Why Snap and Flatpak make Linux a better OS and how they're different

For a long time, Linux received a bad rap for not just being difficult to use, but for not having the software necessary to be productive. Those concerns were reasonable during the early days of Linux ...